Featured Harp Guitar of the Month
Contra Bass Harp Guitars:
Gargantuan and Groundbreaking!
by Gregg Miner, August, 2016
More and more, vintage guitar and mandolin historians are beginning to recognize and appreciate the creativity and genius of Chicago luthier Joseph Bohmann (1848-1928). Bohmann even has an entry in the latest Grove Dictionary of Musical Instruments, courtesy of his main biographer, Bruce Hammond.
Though my main Bohmann page remains a bit out of date, I wanted to address one of his important instrument designs separately here: the "contra bass" size guitar and harp guitar. This seems to be pretty forward thinking in 1895!
This then, is a new, detailed examination of the Bohmann catalog entries and the very few historical specimens known. There are now duplicate copies known of two distinct Bohmann catalogs, one from about 1895 (or slightly before) and one from about 1899. We have scans of these thanks to (originally) Rich Myers (for the c.1899), and later, historian Bruce Hammond, Bohmann’s dedicated biographer (for both).
order to understand Bohmann’s contra bass harp guitar
for the duration of this article), we also need to
understand his Grand
Concert Contra Bass Guitar (GCCBG),
as they go hand and hand.
And it may be best to first investigate them in
the later c.1899 Bohmann catalog, then go
back and look at the c.1895 catalog, which has some
is one of the only fully intact original surviving GCCBG specimens known.
As you can see, it’s huge!
(Its bridge is non-original.)
catalogs give the body dimensions (for the CBHG)
as 23” in length, 19” in width and 6” in depth.
In the c.1899 catalog (immediately below), the harp guitar was offered in a 12-string or 18-string version – meaning, with either six or twelve sub-bass strings. One could ask for any one of Bohmann’s “regular guitar styles from No. 1 to 14, inclusive.”
Having studied the c.1899 entry above, let’s examine the other (below). Approximately four years earlier, Bohmann’s c.1895 catalog lists what is certainly the very same two instruments, though appears to be rife with errors – all of them having then been cleared up in the c.1899 catalog above.
how the 6-string GCCBG is described as “with double
neck,” confounding this curious error further by the offer
of “Add $8.00 for ea. extra string wanted.”
Clearly, it was the CBHG on the facing page
that had two necks (as it states). And
the harp guitar version had its own $8 “additional
string” option, where it made sense.
This must have been something equivalent to a simple
“copy/paste” error of the typesetters.
the CBHG page, we find an even more incredible claim: “This
guitar is made in 18 to 32 strings.”(!)
Well, no – around 1900 Hopzapfel would build George
Dudley his incredible fully-double-course 36-string harp
Was Bohmann involved in such outrageousness earlier?
Or was this another typesetter’s mistake (mis-read)?
Thirty-two is certainly an odd number, whatever
combination of neck and subs we envision, so I believe it is
And of course, in the next catalog, he writes “12
or 18-string,” which makes more sense.
He also fixes the GCCBG information and other errors
like correcting to “inclusive,” rather than “1 to 14,
c.1895 catalog does not picture either instrument
(perhaps they were just too new?), but features on the
following page the striking photo of Calamara.
Bohmann proclaims that “This cut represents The
Contra Bass Harp Guitar and the eminent guitar virtuoso
Sig. Emilio Calamara, professor of the first Contra Bass
Harp Guitar, made in America by the world’s Greatest
Musical Instrument Manufacturer Joseph Bohmann.”
(For those new to the world of Joseph Bohmann, yes, he quickly proclaimed himself as “the World’s Greatest Musical Instrument Manufacturer,” though not entirely unmerited, as he won exhibition prizes year after year – seven, in fact, from 1889 to 1900.)
same photo of Calamara and his instrument was used again
in the second catalog and (at left) on sheet music from
This then, would seem to be Bohmann’s CBHG “prototype.” It has twelve sub-basses and one-of-a-kind headstocks. It looks narrower in the upper bout and waist, so may not have achieved it’s maximum size until the c.1895 catalog. Bruce and I conjecture that this was quite possibly the guitar alluded to in Calamara’s personal letter to Bohmann dated December 30, 1892 (at right), even though no details of the guitar were given. Calamara had been playing an Italian harp guitar of unknown make (illustrated on his business card and seen in a single photograph in the Valisi Orchestra for some time prior to switching to the Bohmann (below).
wonderful as the Calamara image is, the key image in the
c.1899 catalog is of Bohmann himself, complete with his
own CBHG (or two):
is a wonderful and important bit of harp guitar
there are some aggravating conundrums on this page that
Bruce and I simply cannot resolve.
Note the subheading that states “From ‘Music
Trades,’ January 4, 1896” (there is even a byline
– “P. J. M.” – at the close).
We haven’t yet located an easily accessible
source for this important periodical (not to be confused
with “The Music Trade Review,” which is now online)
to see what it reveals.
The article indeed starts out as if reprinting a
January, 1896 magazine piece.
In fact, it opens with a report of the Dec. 7,
1895 shop fire “a few weeks ago” that wiped out
Bohmann ‘s entire shop and contents.
speculate that by the third
paragraph, however, Bohmann is coaching the writer (or
writing this himself), and seemingly at a much later date (1899?).
Surely only the relentlessly egocentric luthier
would refer to himself (as the fellow in the
photograph) as “Mr. Bohmann’s best working man, who
has originated this great American industry.”
This paragraph definitely appears to be referring
to the center photograph, with the harp guitar “held
between the knees similar to the cello” and “by his
side...his son, Joseph Frederick Bohmann...”
Problem is, little Freddie was born in January, 1897.
Barring an error in the Federal Census, this
photo would have to be from, when – late 1899 at the
this exercise is (for me) simply to date the first
historical appearance of these particular instruments,
and – not counting
Calamara’s prototype – somewhere between the late
1895 fire and the appearance of the c.1899 catalog seems
to be it (note the statement about the “Bohmann harp
guitar, now published for the first time...”).
Bohmann’s instrument could be something that was built
before the fire in 1895.
It all boils down to resolving the issues above.
text confirms that the
strings were tuned chromatically; at what pitch, we
don’t know, but Eb down to E is the most logical
still trying to hear in my head the musical effects
described by “As a solo instrument, beautiful sweeping
arpeggios can be made on the chromatic strings, and also
runs in thirds and fifths not possible otherwise.”
c.1895-1899 CBHG has
six strings on the neck and twelve subs on a neck of the
same length (though the bridge lengthens the
increasingly lower strings some).
Interestingly, it looks like Bohmann may be
color-coding his basses, much like Gibson soon would.
We assume his instrument has his dramatic and
groundbreaking sunburst back and sides – judging from
the instrument sitting sideways to the camera, which
looks like another CBHG.
Surprisingly, neither catalog mentions his
dramatic and incredibly groundbreaking sunburst finish
This 1898 sheet music (courtesy of Barry Trott) depicts an all-female ensemble from Portland, Oregon. The accompanist is no delicate flower – she is handling a full size Bohmann contra bass harp guitar! Hers also has twelve subs, with headstocks different than either Calamara’s or Bohmann’s. Bohmann made other normal sized harp guitars similar in appearance to the CBHG and with that same bridge, so it’s a little tricky to positively identify these without knowing the size of the performers. But in this case, the high position of the bridge reveals the much larger soundboard area below it.
There are many more historical photos of Bohmann harp guitar players on my original main page, but none include instruments as large as the Contra Bass Harp Guitar.
As seen above, the catalogs state: “Length of body, 23 inches; across body back of bridge, 19 inches; and depth of body, 6 inches.” Mine is slightly different – the same 19” wide but with a body over two feet long (24-1/8”)!
It’s just 5″ deep at the tail block, but about 5-3/4″ in the center of the heavily domed back – so is close to Bohmann’s stated 6”. The upper bout is 14″ wide. Most significantly, there is an incredible ten inches of soundboard real estate below the bridge alone! Scale length is exactly 25”.
Note that for some reason, deliberate or accidental, the two necks and bridge ended up significantly askew on the body. All Bohmann’s other harp guitars seem perfectly planned out.
This instrument was a prize that came to the attention of Bruce Hammond some years ago. It was dumb luck that I ended up with it (to Bruce’s everlasting consternation!).
When received, it had a huge added metal tailpiece support – so huge we wondered what soundboard problems it might have been hiding. It had also had the name “Linscott” engraved in the third fret position marker.
The family unfortunately had very little information on this fellow. The instrument’s caretaker, Shelby Norton, told me that Linscott “was my son’s great-grandfather. I do know his last name was Linscott; his first name may have been William. He may have lived on the east coast in the New York area, possibly Long Island. He may have played in some capacity as a professional musician or in a band or orchestra of some type, and may have also played banjo. He had a son named Elbert William Linscott (known as Scotty), who was also a musician.”
Bruce Hammond looked through all his original Bohmann correspondence letters and came up empty. Even so, I was somewhat shocked and disappointed that when the instrument arrived, “Linscott” was gone – sanded off by the owner who thought it was diminishing its value.
Why ten strings? Note that the four lowest courses are doubled in octaves as in the standard 12-string guitar, while the top two courses are single. As outlined in my article “The Birth of the American 12-string Guitar,” this configuration was a “new invention” of 1896 that quickly evolved into the full-blown American 12-string guitar around 1900. Odds are good that Bohmann may have been aware of this evolutionary “missing link” Grunewald-built 10-string. If Bohmann subscribed to the Music Trade Review, he would have had to have known about it. Or perhaps Linscott had learned of this intriguing new stringing option and requested it.
Happily, when restorer Kerry Char removed the added tailpiece, we discovered the top was perfectly intact and visually presentable. Of course a huge swath of the soundboard has been worn to “washboard condition,” as is the fingerboard – Linscott clearly played the hell out of this thing!
When Kerry removed the back, he found an even bigger surprise: Bohmann’s incredible lattice bracing. At left is as found – all original, with an added portion to the brace below the soundhole (above). Note the narrow bits of bridge plate portions with screws poking through, part of Bohmann’s unique pinless bridge (see below). Below, Kerry has replaced the top three braces and strengthened that compromised area with an extra layer of spruce. Note also the full width heel block!
|Somehow this elaborate mess keeps the instrument stable without deadening the sound. This sucker is a monster. Musicians speak nebulously of “depth of tone” – but here is true tonal depth!|
|At left is Bohmann’s humongous
“label” (really more like an “internal
advertisement”!) which seems to date this
instrument to 1900 or shortly after.
For some reason, he cut off the upper right
corner (nothing was printed there).
He then pasted over this large label a cutting
from his tradecard, showing his seven exhibition awards
from 1889 to 1900).
At the bottom he also pastes in his then-current
address, which he was leasing years earlier.
The problem with dating Bohmann's instruments is that we have ample evidence of him warehousing unfinished instruments (you'll see one below) – for years or even decades. So features that appear to be earlier can be seen with features or clues that seem to point to much later (specifically, the patented internal tone rods).
So he might well have started this instrument in the mid or later 1890's but finished it for Linscott much later.
|Bohmann utilized nearly the entire gamut of sub-bass stringing options on his harp guitars, anywhere from 3 to 12. This instrument was tuned chromatically (probably Eb down to low E), and likely strung with then-common ball end silk & steel strings. I just love Bohmann’s bridges. I’m not sure if I’ve strung the neck strings exactly as planned (Bohmann chose to double then up on his standard 6-string layout), but it works!|
|Other than the custom
neck stringing, my Bohmann differs from the other known
specimens most significantly in being without
Bohmann’s internal “tone rods.”
You’ll see these fascinating, patented devices
remains inexplicable is the timing of the patent for
this strange invention.
The patent (1,128,218)
was applied for on November 4th, 1912
and granted in 1915 –
but the rods themselves show up in instruments that we think were built over a dozen
in the late 1890s (again, that storing away for later
was finished at the end of this same time period
(c.1900), so I wonder why the rods weren’t included
– perhaps Linscott requested to leave them out.
Or we may learn that the rods didn’t appear
until later and our dating is simply that far off.
Mine is also absent the beautiful sunburst finish, due to the fact that it’s made of Brazilian rosewood (a 3-ply sandwich of rosewood/maple/rosewood). As with future sunburst finishes, Bohmann’s dramatic colors worked with maple but would make little sense with rosewood.
The first appeared almost identical to Bohmann’s own lap-held instrument, but was incomplete. It had both necks in place on a body complete with sunburst finish and six internal tone rods installed. It was just missing the bridge and tuners.
Here it is as
found, photographed by Bruce Hammond at Ax-In-Hand,
whose original owner Larry Henricksen bought up the
Bohmann time-capsule inventory a few decades ago.
I’ve yet to learn of any production guitars
with a sunburst finish earlier than Bohmann’s 1890’s
instruments – surely this is a topic ripe for
Interestingly, Bruce Hammond has observed that for early "Era 1" (pre-1910) Bohmann instruments, the striking sunburst finish appeared only on birdseye maple instruments, not flame maple, which received a uniform natural finish. On Era 2 (post-1910) instruments, Bohmann applied it to flame maple as well.
This Ax-In-Hand CBHG eventually made its way to Mike Anderson of Elkhart, Indiana, who had repairman Ron Koivisto (at right) complete it in 2013. This short article tells how “the restoration project sent Koivisto on a series of internet investigations to deduce the right size and shape for the bridge, how to affix it, what gauge of strings to use, how to tune it and a dozen other puzzles.” I was never contacted by Ron, but I hope my site and articles came in handy (perhaps not...the article refers to it as a “guitar harp”).
other CBHG found in the Bohmann shop discovery was a
strange chimera of a thing.
The size and shape appear the same as the
previous instruments, though the back is even more
heavily domed – which coincides with a later date (the
instrument is stamped #1910).
It has flame maple back and sides and a natural
finish . Though
they were missing when discovered, it originally had the
same six internal tone rods.
Bridge pins now plug the holes in the butt of the
headstocks, however, are those bizarre
futuristic-looking monstrosities with the outrageous
handmade tuning machines seen in two later (Era 2) well-known harp guitars
(ex-Chinery and the late
Bill Camp). The
fretboards, with those creatively-shaped ends, are
also from this later period.
The bridge is pure Bohmann from this later period, but appears to have replaced an earlier bridge, likely two separate bridges similar to the harp guitars mentioned above.
Similarly bizarre are the 8 single strings on the neck, the lower two which are actually over "false frets" and are actually meant to pair with the ten sub-basses for a full chromatic octave!
and I have no idea quite what to make of this one!
are the two above specimens taken side by side by Bruce
at Ax-In-Hand. They
both have flat spruce tops and similar maple bodies – one
birdseye, one flame – with two
different finishes. The
presumed 1910 body on the right is more heavily domed than the
pre-1900 body on the left.
The presumed 1910 body on the right is more heavily domed than the pre-1900 body on the left.
question we have is whether Bohmann used maple ply
on his maple-bodied instruments, because he always used
ply on his rosewood instruments (Brazilian
I don’t know if that was meant for tone,
durability or for easier steaming over his giant heated
cast iron molds. His
rosewood instruments invariably show the fine cracking
and “feathering” of the outer Brazilian rosewood
unfinished Brazilian rosewood inside weathers better.
Mine had significant back separation near a lower
bout so we were able to see the thin maple layer
sandwiched therein (regrettably, we didn’t measure or
final surviving Bohmann CBHG is perhaps most amazing of
only learned of this in early 2016 when Dazzo Pickups’
Teddy Randazzo posted this amazing “selfie” on his
Facebook page – taken during a visit to Mickie Zekley
(Lark in the Morning founder/owner).
had it forever, and kindly sent me a few more photos of
body appears to be the same as the others, with
the exact same sunburst finish as the uncompleted
instrument above and the same bridge as Bohmann’s and
mine for 12 sub-basses.
Surely these are all from the same c.1895-1900
the bass neck on this one!
Instead of the usual squat sub-bass neck and head, Bohmann seems to have finally taken a cue from European kontragitarres. We have yet to find proof, but we believe Bohmann was quite likely aware and perhaps even familiar with these early Austro-German harp guitars, even though he followed a very different muse for his own instruments. Did he repurpose one of the metal tuner plate arrays from a German instrument or create his own engraved version from scratch? Kontragitarre expert Benoît Meulle-Stef says "They're absolutely not stock tuners, I have never seen any kontra with that!" Note that additionally it has Bohmann’s own unique “ring” tuner buttons, just like the second Ax-In-Hand instrument above.
In that sense, this may be another "transitional," or "start-stop-finish or modify" Bohmann creation, with a body, finish and bridge of the late 1890s and 6-string head design and ring tuners , along with the internal rods of the 1910s.
How do we solve the enigmatic riddle of Bohmann features?!
|Note that these are
just a small sampling of Bohmann’s incredible harp
have a few more to add to the main
Bohmann page, then clean that original study up –
there is more to decipher!
|Harp Guitar of the Month: Archives|
Authors, Scholars: Want to create a page about a certain harp guitar
maker or instrument? Contact
If you enjoyed this article, or found it useful for research, please consider supporting Harpguitars.net so that this information will be available for others like you and to future generations. Thanks!
If you enjoyed this article, or found it
useful for research, please consider making a donation to The
Harp Guitar Foundation,
All Site Contents Copyright © Gregg Miner,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright and Fair Use of material and use of images: See Copyright and Fair Use policy.